<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vivacious Verse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bardblog.com/vivacious-verse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bardblog.com/vivacious-verse/</link>
	<description>Quips, Quibbles, Queries, and Quarks from a Quirky Bardolator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rigel Fuller</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/vivacious-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Rigel Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=376#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with this. I can&#039;t stand long plays and I&#039;m sure other people feel the same way. Everything needs to be well thought out and keep you thinking. This play is to entertain you. Some classmates of mine presented one scene from Richard III and it took about 40 minutes. It was so boring and slow. They need to put energy into it and clearly pronounce what they say. Otherwise it just makes the play boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with this. I can&#8217;t stand long plays and I&#8217;m sure other people feel the same way. Everything needs to be well thought out and keep you thinking. This play is to entertain you. Some classmates of mine presented one scene from Richard III and it took about 40 minutes. It was so boring and slow. They need to put energy into it and clearly pronounce what they say. Otherwise it just makes the play boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/vivacious-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>JM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=376#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Learn how to handle the words and &quot;The Words Will Act You&quot;. A concept I learned at Riverside. It&#039;s been one of my maxims in acting, teaching, and directing, ever since. My daughter, much against the wise advice of her dad, pursued and now has a degree in Theatre Performance. Her laments to me during the process of getting that degree were many times exemplary of what it is to &quot;know more than your teacher&quot;. Their focus was not at all on the words, but on spending more time focusing on &quot;subtext&quot;. (Very SUB indeed) Her professors often wondered why she seemed &quot;ahead of things&quot; in the process of rehearsal as they saw it. Simply, because of her attention to the words at the outset, she was ready to start &quot;acting&quot; them long before the rest. And that knowledge carried over into performance. When she entered, whether it was Wilde or Shakespeare or something more modern, the TEMPO of the whole piece picked up noticeably--and so did the attention of the audience. This is not the &quot;Grand Secret&quot; unfortunately preserved as such by the stubborn and willful, who still focus on the &quot;popular notion&quot; of what acting might be all about, and wonder why those British actors seem to &quot;have the knack&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learn how to handle the words and &#8220;The Words Will Act You&#8221;. A concept I learned at Riverside. It&#8217;s been one of my maxims in acting, teaching, and directing, ever since. My daughter, much against the wise advice of her dad, pursued and now has a degree in Theatre Performance. Her laments to me during the process of getting that degree were many times exemplary of what it is to &#8220;know more than your teacher&#8221;. Their focus was not at all on the words, but on spending more time focusing on &#8220;subtext&#8221;. (Very SUB indeed) Her professors often wondered why she seemed &#8220;ahead of things&#8221; in the process of rehearsal as they saw it. Simply, because of her attention to the words at the outset, she was ready to start &#8220;acting&#8221; them long before the rest. And that knowledge carried over into performance. When she entered, whether it was Wilde or Shakespeare or something more modern, the TEMPO of the whole piece picked up noticeably&#8211;and so did the attention of the audience. This is not the &#8220;Grand Secret&#8221; unfortunately preserved as such by the stubborn and willful, who still focus on the &#8220;popular notion&#8221; of what acting might be all about, and wonder why those British actors seem to &#8220;have the knack&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

