<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hamlet Uncut is 5 Hours Long!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bardblog.com/hamlet-uncut-is-5-hours-long/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bardblog.com/hamlet-uncut-is-5-hours-long/</link>
	<description>Quips, Quibbles, Queries, and Quarks from a Quirky Bardolator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:32:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.K.Farrar</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/hamlet-uncut-is-5-hours-long/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>A.K.Farrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=184#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I sat through a &#039;cut&#039; Hamlet that was over 4 hours and a half (with intervals) and many a cut one feels much more.
Speed of delivery was certainly different - but what wasn&#039;t played in Shakespeare&#039;s time is the &#039;un-cut&#039; text we now have. 

What is noticeable in it are the repeats and mismatches.

Shakespeare texts as printed were rarely what you heard on stage - as I recently mentioned elsewhere, Hamlet gives us the classic reason for believing texts were adapted and changed for individual performances - Hamlet changes &#039;The Mousetrap&quot;.

The Hamlet text is questioned - and often regarded as the least complete Shakespeare text precisely because it is not reflective of a performance but contains far too much for a satisfying theatre experience (especially if you are standing in the theatre on a January day and the light is fading fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sat through a &#8216;cut&#8217; Hamlet that was over 4 hours and a half (with intervals) and many a cut one feels much more.<br />
Speed of delivery was certainly different &#8211; but what wasn&#8217;t played in Shakespeare&#8217;s time is the &#8216;un-cut&#8217; text we now have. </p>
<p>What is noticeable in it are the repeats and mismatches.</p>
<p>Shakespeare texts as printed were rarely what you heard on stage &#8211; as I recently mentioned elsewhere, Hamlet gives us the classic reason for believing texts were adapted and changed for individual performances &#8211; Hamlet changes &#8216;The Mousetrap&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Hamlet text is questioned &#8211; and often regarded as the least complete Shakespeare text precisely because it is not reflective of a performance but contains far too much for a satisfying theatre experience (especially if you are standing in the theatre on a January day and the light is fading fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken in Albuquerque</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/hamlet-uncut-is-5-hours-long/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken in Albuquerque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=184#comment-353</guid>
		<description>One of the many Shakespeare-related myths is that the BBC versions of the plays are uncut. The BBC Hamlet has considerable cuts in every act of the play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the many Shakespeare-related myths is that the BBC versions of the plays are uncut. The BBC Hamlet has considerable cuts in every act of the play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
