<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editions of Shakespeare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bardblog.com/editions-of-shakespeare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bardblog.com/editions-of-shakespeare/</link>
	<description>Quips, Quibbles, Queries, and Quarks from a Quirky Bardolator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:51:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jody Vojta</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/editions-of-shakespeare/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody Vojta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=136#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Hi,I obtain that your weblog is very beneficial and helpful and we were interested if there can be a possibility of getting More article content like this on your web site. If you willing to support us out, we would be willing to compensate you... Kind regards, Jody Vojta</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,I obtain that your weblog is very beneficial and helpful and we were interested if there can be a possibility of getting More article content like this on your web site. If you willing to support us out, we would be willing to compensate you&#8230; Kind regards, Jody Vojta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/editions-of-shakespeare/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=136#comment-267</guid>
		<description>I find myself going back to three editions, over and over.

The newset Folgers are very, very good, especially for the casual reader or the &quot;Shakespeare-curious.&quot; One of the best things is that the introductions don&#039;t assume you&#039;ve already read the play!  So they&#039;re great to hand to someone who is going to see some summer festival Shakespeare and would like to check it out in print.  They also include a critical essay at the end of each play, and these are sometimes so good that they&#039;ve changed my whole outlook on a play (Henry VIII, for example).

Most of the time, though, the Signet Classics are my favorites.  Very readable, with one of the best footnoting schemes around.  They also come with a whole selection of critical essays, excerpts from source material, and solid textual notes.  Very approachable, but you can still dig deep with them.

For heavy-duty scholarship, I pick up the Arden editions, but these are so clogged with notes that I find it very diffficult to _read_ these editions--they&#039;re more for _consulting_.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find myself going back to three editions, over and over.</p>
<p>The newset Folgers are very, very good, especially for the casual reader or the &#8220;Shakespeare-curious.&#8221; One of the best things is that the introductions don&#8217;t assume you&#8217;ve already read the play!  So they&#8217;re great to hand to someone who is going to see some summer festival Shakespeare and would like to check it out in print.  They also include a critical essay at the end of each play, and these are sometimes so good that they&#8217;ve changed my whole outlook on a play (Henry VIII, for example).</p>
<p>Most of the time, though, the Signet Classics are my favorites.  Very readable, with one of the best footnoting schemes around.  They also come with a whole selection of critical essays, excerpts from source material, and solid textual notes.  Very approachable, but you can still dig deep with them.</p>
<p>For heavy-duty scholarship, I pick up the Arden editions, but these are so clogged with notes that I find it very diffficult to _read_ these editions&#8211;they&#8217;re more for _consulting_.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.K.Farrar</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/editions-of-shakespeare/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>A.K.Farrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=136#comment-254</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just started to &#039;review&#039; The Penguin Shakespeare, Two Gentlemen of Verona over on my blog for anyone interested enough to view it.  As I work through the canon I hope to explore various other editions - although expect a very personal response rather than reasoned assessment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just started to &#8216;review&#8217; The Penguin Shakespeare, Two Gentlemen of Verona over on my blog for anyone interested enough to view it.  As I work through the canon I hope to explore various other editions &#8211; although expect a very personal response rather than reasoned assessment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/editions-of-shakespeare/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=136#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I like the New Folger Library editions, but that may just be force of habit; in high school and most of college, whenever we&#039;d study or perform (of course you can&#039;t perform without studying...) a Shakespeare play, this was the edition the teacher/director had available. I enjoy the accessibility and depth of the footnotes, as well as the explanations in the front of how the edition was put together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the New Folger Library editions, but that may just be force of habit; in high school and most of college, whenever we&#8217;d study or perform (of course you can&#8217;t perform without studying&#8230;) a Shakespeare play, this was the edition the teacher/director had available. I enjoy the accessibility and depth of the footnotes, as well as the explanations in the front of how the edition was put together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.K.Farrar</title>
		<link>http://www.bardblog.com/editions-of-shakespeare/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>A.K.Farrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bardblog.com/?p=136#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Why buy at all nowadays?

There are several vary good on-line &#039;editions&#039; - I use the PlayShakespeare (http://www.playshakespeare.com/) ones myself.

Many of the Folio and Quarto texts are available also - so back to the original if you can cope (and a lot more people will be able to cope than think).

For sticking in my pocket and reading by the river I tend to take  the Penguin Shakespeare - right size, not too heavy (both in terms of weight and scholarship) - explanations at the back if needed, and a reasonable intro essay at the front - both on the text, on the performances of the play and on &#039;further reading&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why buy at all nowadays?</p>
<p>There are several vary good on-line &#8216;editions&#8217; &#8211; I use the PlayShakespeare (<a href="http://www.playshakespeare.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.playshakespeare.com/</a>) ones myself.</p>
<p>Many of the Folio and Quarto texts are available also &#8211; so back to the original if you can cope (and a lot more people will be able to cope than think).</p>
<p>For sticking in my pocket and reading by the river I tend to take  the Penguin Shakespeare &#8211; right size, not too heavy (both in terms of weight and scholarship) &#8211; explanations at the back if needed, and a reasonable intro essay at the front &#8211; both on the text, on the performances of the play and on &#8216;further reading&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
